The News
Most Recent Threads
The Blogs
Most Recent Threads
The Boards
Most Recent Threads

 
SmirkingChimpWire

  • Obama makes clearest hint that Clinton could be running mate May 9 2008 - 8:38am (10 comments)
  • Irrational Ambition is Hillary Clinton’s Flaw May 9 2008 - 1:11am (6 comments)
  • Raided counsel's office shut down investigation into Siegelman case May 8 2008 - 12:02pm (1 comments)
  • Florida Substitute Teacher Fired, Accused of Wizardry May 8 2008 - 9:19am (15 comments)
  • Clinton strategist to Clinton it is over! May 8 2008 - 12:37am (3 comments)
  • We now know who the nominee will be May 7 2008 - 1:24am (16 comments)

  • Smirking Chimp
    All Recent Posting Activity | Topics & Issues | Events | Polls | Chimp 1.0

    About | Contact | Advertise | Shop | Donate

    The Latest Clinton Canard
    by Cenk Uygur | March 26, 2008 - 8:25am

    article tools: email | print | read more Cenk Uygur

    The latest talking point for Hillary Clinton is this race is still early in the process and primaries from previous years were decided much later in the year. She recently told Time, as well almost every other interviewer she's talked to, "I remind a lot of people that my husband didn't formally wrap up the nomination until June."

    The point is supposed to be that this race isn't over. They're just getting started. Give her more time. Here's the problem, that isn't really true.

    In 1992, the year Bill Clinton won the nomination she's alluding to, the primaries started significantly later than they did in 2008. Iowa was on January 3rd this year and on February 10th in 1992 (remember, this year we'd already had Super Tuesday by Feb. 5th). New Hampshire was on January 8th in 2008 and February 18th in 1992. Super Tuesday was on Feb. 5th this year and was on March 10th in 1992 (we'd already had the so-called second Super Tuesday in Ohio and Texas by this date in 2008).

    Secondly, despite the later start Bill Clinton had already locked up the nomination by early April after the New York primary. Hillary Clinton knows this and that's why she inserts a lawyerly word into her statement every time -- formally. "My husband didn't formally wrap up the nomination until June." [emphasis added]

    So, why does she employ this needless piece of sophistry? Because she thinks she needs it. She needs to buy more time (can't you just see Scotty yelling down to Captain Kirk, "I need more time!").

    The extra time isn't for more elections, there are only ten left. We've already had more than the lion's share of contests. It is abundantly clear that she can't catch him just based on the remaining elections. No, time buys her something else -- the chance for Obama to implode between now and whenever he formally wraps up the nomination.

    If it was only a matter of Obama's candidacy self-destructing, that would be one thing. She could sit back and see if anything changes through the next set of elections. You can argue that she's earned that. But it's another thing if she is actively trying to push Obama off the cliff with the extra time she's buying, even though she knows there is a great likelihood that he will be the Democratic nominee.

    If you don't care about the Democratic Party or who their nominee is or how they do in the general election, then you have all the right in the world to keep pounding away at your opponent. Who cares how badly you damage him if you're only interested in yourself? Who knows, it might even help your political career later.

    But there is one group of people who do care -- Democratic voters. They are beginning to understand that this race is over and the cheap shots at this point aren't helping anyone but John McCain.

    The problem isn't hitting Obama; the problem is hitting Obama after the bell. This contest is effectively over and Clinton is using her heaviest guns now. Perhaps she should have rolled them out earlier, but unleashing her most ferocious lines of attack after the writing is already on the wall seems like poor sportsmanship, to say the least.

    It reminds me of when I used to watch WWF as a kid. The good guy would win the match and he would be strutting around the ring as the crowd cheered. And that's when the bad guy would get up, sneak behind him and clobber him in the back of the head. This was a cue to the audience -- the guy who hit after the bell was clearly the bad guy.

    And if they were a really bad guy, they'd use a chair or worse. Who can forget the time "Rowdy" Roddy Piper hit Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka with a belt? Hillary, you don't want to be Rowdy Roddy Piper. He was the bad guy, a really bad guy.

    Watch TYT Here
    _______

    Vote Result
    ++++++++--
    Score: 8.6, Votes: 7

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

    At Least Scotty Was Honestly Trying to Fix Something

    HIllary's got a wrench in her hands alright, but I don't like the look on her face.

    I have to say, Cenk, that while I am already a huge fan of your show, TYT, your writing of late has increased my estimation of your gift of insight and logic. The Clinton campaign has, for a while now, had an air of desperation about it. Those of us who still consider ourselves Democrats, but have begun to question why, are wondering just how deeply into the mud she and her legacy-destroying husband are willing to drag this thing.

    If Bones and Scotty were on Hillary's crew, Bones would long ago have declared this sad show moribund and wandered off in search of a good single malt and Scotty would likely have diverted all impulse power to the starboard (that is RIGHT, the direction Hillary seems to instinctively lean) nacelles in order to give the lumbering wreck just enough momentum to auger into the sun.

    Submitted by fearandloathing on March 26, 2008 - 8:58am.

    "That which does not kill

    "That which does not kill you makes you strong." --Conan the Barbarian

    Well, that's bullshit, really, isn't it? As any Iraq war veteran can tell you, that which does not kill you leaves you crippled for life. But it does apply in some circumstances. I don't really worry about the mud Hillary throws at Obama, because I know the Republicans will do as bad or worse. If she can cut him down, she is, in a way, doing us a favor, because it's better that he get cut down now rather than in the general election.

    But she really is a rotten sport, isn't she?

    _______

    Any animal can be tricked into acting contrary to its own interests. Only humans can do this to themselves. --Mock Twain

    Submitted by MrTH on March 26, 2008 - 10:21am.

    The Clintons need to just

    The Clintons need to just come to terms with the fact that Obama has run the better campaign and the race is effectively over. A poll that came out yesterday from msnbc said that Obama is still relatively untouched by the Wright fiasco while Clinton's negatives have gone up to 48%. Hillary's tactics at this point are not just designed to make Obama seem less electable to the superdelegates, they're designed to make Obama seem unelectable. The problem is that it's a hard case to make when she's hurting her own cause at the sametime. Contrary to what the Clintons think, Obama is not going to fuck up. Throughout the whole campaign the Obama camp was run with more disipline, a better message, and more consistency that the Clintons' but then again you don't run for president as a black man and get this close to the nomination by being stupid and wreckless.

    Submitted by gregmatic on March 26, 2008 - 7:57pm.

    How disingenuous....she

    How disingenuous....she knows perfectly well this year's primaries are different. She must think we're all stupid, like the GOP does.

    And she may be right. We are stupid! I saw on the tube today that if "their" candidate is not on the ballot, 44% of those Dems would vote for McCain!!!!!!

    Got your passport ready?

    Submitted by Smartalex on March 26, 2008 - 8:32pm.
     
    100 Most Recent Threads | Topics & Issues | Events | Polls | Chimp 1.0

    Home | Top

    About | Contact | Advertise | Shop | Donate

    Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

    © 2008 Smirking Chimp Media

    bot trap